![]() ![]() Looking at bounce is a bit of a preferential factor, but the data below does help to show a good picture of the performance of each mattress. The slowest mattresses in this matchup include the following:Īll of these mattresses took between 4.5 and 6.0 seconds to be completely recovered.Īcross all mattresses we’ve tested to date, on average we see mattresses mostly recovered by 0.60 seconds and fully recovered by 0.96 seconds.Ī closer visual of the level of responsiveness for each mattress is documented in the videos below. Slightly slower, but still pretty fast is the DreamCloud Premier-mostly recovered by 0.9 seconds and fully recovered by 1.5 seconds. If you’re looking for a fast response time, the Nectar Premier and Nectar Premier Copper take the lead.īoth of these mattresses are completely recovered from our test drop within less than 1 second, the Nectar Premier slightly outperforming the Premier Copper. Nectar is pretty similar on some mattresses and vastly different on other mattresses. The graphs below show a quantifiable version of motion transfer based on accelerometer data. The average amount of motion transfer across all mattresses tested to date is 5.89 m/s² so all Nectar and DreamCloud mattresses are better than average. The original DreamCloudcomes in at 5.60 m/s² and the DreamCloud Premier is 5.67 m/s². That said, the levels of the original DreamCloud and DreamCloud Premier are about twice the level of Nectar. The DreamCloud Premier Rest has low levels that essentially match the levels on the Nectar original (2.62 m/s² on the Premier Rest). In fact, it is the 2nd lowest motion transfer of all mattresses we’ve tested to date. The Nectar Premier Copper is incredibly low. The original Nectar mattress falls between these two at 2.67 m/s². Their levels range from 1.88 m/s² on the Nectar Premier Copper up to 2.80 m/s² on the Nectar Premier. Your browser does not support the video tag.įor the absolute lowest levels, Nectar is the winner. For this test, we lie on the mattress for 15 minutes, get off the mattress, and then take periodic surface level temperature measurements. Ending Temperature (after 5 minutes) – the temperature of the mattress after being lied upon and having no one on it for 5 minutesīelow, you can watch a video of how the heat dissipates on each mattress during our cooling test.Maximum Temperature (0 minute) – the temperature of the mattress after lying on it for 15 minutes.Baseline Temperature – the temperature of the mattress before anyone lies on it.The table below outlines how each mattress performed during our cooling tests. ![]() ![]() ![]() Nectar Original or Nectar Premier or Nectar Premier CopperĭreamCloud or DreamCloud Premier or DreamCloud Premier Restįor cooling performance, Nectar is better across the board than DreamCloud. The table below marks some honorable mentions for a number of factors that may be important to you.ĭepending on what exactly you’re looking for, you may find DreamCloud or Nectar to be best suited for your needs. Factorīefore diving into the specific tests, let’s highlight some of the best models for specific needs. If you’re looking for the hard data numbers, this is the table for you. The following table shows scores from the same mattresses listed above, but with a bit more detail. This first table shows the factor scoring of all current models that we have tested: Factor Here is a full comparison of all current models we’ve tested between DreamCloud vs. We score each mattress using a series of performance tests. At NapLab, we put each mattress to the test. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |